2 cases were described. In the first, nonwoven strength claims made without specifying the method resulted in rejection of the patent, and an appeal based on the fact that it was obvious to the skilled person that EDANA methods would be used for a nonwoven was thrown out. In a similar situation a different patent appeal board granted a similarly unclear patent. The recommendation – if you must use parameter claims, do your homework and remember that different boards have different views!
Also on Patents:
Krzysztof-Daniel Malowaniec Senior Vice President, Paul Hartmann (Germany) observed that of the 1000 patents per year on absorbent hygienic products, only ~6 per year covered male incontinence. Nearly all male products cover light incontinence only and patents focus on their geometry and chassis construction. Pouches, penis bags, tubes, shaped pads, clamps, catheters and condoms all appear in the literature and there appear to be many more products than necessary. However the ageing of the population and increasing demand from developing countries is likely to change that, and male incontinence could once again become an area for innovation.
Also on Patents:
Krzysztof-Daniel Malowaniec Senior Vice President, Paul Hartmann (Germany) observed that of the 1000 patents per year on absorbent hygienic products, only ~6 per year covered male incontinence. Nearly all male products cover light incontinence only and patents focus on their geometry and chassis construction. Pouches, penis bags, tubes, shaped pads, clamps, catheters and condoms all appear in the literature and there appear to be many more products than necessary. However the ageing of the population and increasing demand from developing countries is likely to change that, and male incontinence could once again become an area for innovation.
No comments:
Post a Comment