Q. When is a biopolymer not a biopolymer: A. When it’s a polyolefin.
Last month’s Biopolymer World Conference in Venice was a “first”
and a great way to catch up with the latest developments in biopolymers, an
increasingly important source of materials for nonwovens now that fossil fuels
are getting pricy. Ahead of the meeting it
was clear that the dictionary definition of biopolymer was being adapted for
marketing purposes but we were nevertheless surprised to discover how different
the modern “biopolymer” had become.
Biopolymer used to refer to a macromolecule produced by
living organisms the key examples being cellulose, chitin, proteins, and DNA. Plant cellulose is the most important
biopolymer, growing naturally in enormous quantities (~100 billion tonnes/year)
most of which ultimately biodegrades to provide the raw materials for the next
generation of plants. In fact
biodegradability and biopolymers are linked by more than the “bio” prefix
because the carbon cycle of life requires all living things to
decompose back to their building blocks for reuse. It was therefore reasonable to begin to
describe the new synthetic biodegradable polymers as bio-polymers even though
they did not originate in nature.
However imagine our surprise when over dinner at the
conference a delegate expressed the view that polyethylene was now the most
important biopolymer on the planet! The
logic for this was impeccable...
